Seeking New a Jersey detox center seems like a single, easy step that anyone can do. However, behind the scenes, the medical community, the psychology community, the treatment community and policy makers are having a silent battle that is starting to overflow into the public spotlight, at least in Ohio. The debate there with professionals and representatives illustrates just how difficult the treatment options for people suffering substance use disorders can be to navigate as well as the shortcomings of the government when it comes to it’s stated goal of improving public health and wellbeing.
Much of the debate centers around the convergence of the three main concerns of the groups: funding, therapy and medication.
From the therapy side, much research shows that many addictions form from environmental factors, traumatic events, depression, anxieties, family issues, and even dna can play a part. Therapists argue that treatment that doesn’t take into account these factors is only treating half of the problem and that the part treated isn’t what likely is the underlying cause of the substance use disorder in the first place. They also argue that a person’s behaviors change as a result of addiction and so simply applying medication doesn’t address habits and resisting triggers which maintain a long life of maintaining sobriety. They also argue that for medications for opioid addiction, for instance, without regulations, the drugs end up being shopped from physicians and sold for profit outside of the regulated medical field.
From the medication assisted treatment side, they argue that many patients for which medications exist, such as the mentioned opioids, which includes drugs like buprenorphine, this is all that’s necessary for many patients seeking sobriety. When confronting the argument of ‘black market sales’ of medications like Suboxone, they insist that more regulations will not fix the problem of small amount of immoral physicians and resellers and simply put more restrictions on their ability to help patients legitimately. Currently, medication assisted treatments have far more restrictions on prescription than the drugs they that cause addiction they are actually allowed to prescribe.
The monetary policy side and regulation side of the argument is charged with unravelling the complex web of causes and effects of each other sides concerns and arguments. The goal of policy is to avoid exacerbating existing problems, not waste money on ineffective options, or worse, wasting money on those aspects which actually contribute to making the problem of growing numbers of people suffering from substance use disorders worse.
All sides in the argument agree that at the moment, the current setup is incapable of handling the problem and their public discourse is changing not only the conversation around addiction itself, but also bringing to light the push/pull that occurs with developing solutions to the country’s problems with drug use.